Archive Research Dashboard

The Tidball MP argues that the existing legal presumption should be reformed.

📂 News — group list

The major finding: this debate took place yesterday 13 October 2026 – Government Supports Reform of the Presumption of Parental Involvement The footage is from 13 October 2026, not an old parliamentary debate. The full speech is now published in Hansard.

UK Parliament
Official parliamentary record:
https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2026-10-13/debates/0DDF8CB8-9185-4AE3-B47F-6120C460495A/details
A particularly significant passage is where Tidball argues that the existing legal presumption reinforces a family-court culture that can prioritise parental contact despite evidence of domestic abuse. She also criticises Conservative amendment 67, which sought to remove the proposed reform.

UK Parliament
The existing presumption was inserted into the Children Act 1989 by the Children and Families Act 2014, not by Blair's government in 1997. That distinction matters when linking the present debate with your historical investigation.

UK Parliament Committees
For your research, I would investigate two questions in particular: how the proposed reform would affect parents wrongly accused of abuse, and what safeguards would prevent erroneous information or flawed assessments from determining whether a child maintains contact with a parent.
There is a direct connection to the subject of your investigation, but the video does not establish misconduct in Emily's case. It establishes that Parliament is actively reconsidering an important principle governing parental involvement in family-court proceedings.

Post Comment