United States v. Epstein, No. 119-cr-00490 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)
← Back to cases | 74 documents | Viewing 24 of 74

Documents

119-cr-00490.002.pdf
119-cr-00490.003.pdf
119-cr-00490.005.pdf
119-cr-00490.006-02.pdf
119-cr-00490.006.01.pdf
119-cr-00490.007.pdf
119-cr-00490.008.pdf
119-cr-00490.009.pdf
119-cr-00490.010.pdf
119-cr-00490.011.pdf
119-cr-00490.011.01.pdf
119-cr-00490.011.02.pdf
119-cr-00490.011.03.pdf
119-cr-00490.012.pdf
119-cr-00490.012.01.pdf
119-cr-00490.013.pdf
119-cr-00490.013.01.pdf
119-cr-00490.013.02.pdf
119-cr-00490.013.03.pdf
119-cr-00490.014.pdf
119-cr-00490.015.pdf
119-cr-00490.016.pdf
119-cr-00490.017.pdf
119-cr-00490.018.pdf
119-cr-00490.020.pdf
119-cr-00490.021.pdf
119-cr-00490.022.pdf
119-cr-00490.023.pdf
119-cr-00490.024.pdf
119-cr-00490.025.01.pdf
119-cr-00490.026.pdf
119-cr-00490.027.pdf
119-cr-00490.028.pdf
119-cr-00490.030.pdf
119-cr-00490.031.pdf
119-cr-00490.032.pdf
119-cr-00490.032.01.pdf
119-cr-00490.034.pdf
119-cr-00490.035.pdf
119-cr-00490.036.pdf
119-cr-00490.037.pdf
119-cr-00490.038.pdf
119-cr-00490.039.pdf
119-cr-00490.041.pdf
119-cr-00490.042.pdf
119-cr-00490.043.pdf
119-cr-00490.044.pdf
119-cr-00490.046.pdf
119-cr-00490.047.pdf
119-cr-00490.047.01.pdf
119-cr-00490.048.pdf
119-cr-00490.049.pdf
119-cr-00490.050.pdf
119-cr-00490.051.pdf
119-cr-00490.052.pdf
119-cr-00490.053.pdf
119-cr-00490.054.pdf
119-cr-00490.055.pdf
119-cr-00490.056.pdf
119-cr-00490.057.pdf
119-cr-00490.060.pdf
119-cr-00490.061.pdf
119-cr-00490.062.pdf
119-cr-00490.063.pdf
119-cr-00490.064.pdf
119-cr-00490.065.pdf
119-cr-00490.066.pdf
119-cr-00490.067.pdf
119-cr-00490.068.pdf
119-cr-00490.069.pdf
119-cr-00490.070.pdf
119-cr-00490.071.pdf
119-cr-00490.072.pdf
119-cr-00490.073.pdf

Preview

Loading case documents...
G D
Reader idle.

Summary

Building four-paragraph summary...
Archive Dashboard

Archive Research Dashboard

0% Processed

Recent Summaries

#3A parent alleges systemic DfE data inaccuracies affecting 758,000 children, including their daughter, details a flawed complaints system and human rights breaches, and has urgently appealed to the ECHR for resolution.
#1Martin Newbold alleges East Sussex has maligned him, citing concerns over a flawed statutory review of children's social care that lacked transparency and proper engagement.